Task · GCI-0105

Correct unsupported dashboard interpretation and absence claims

Description

The operator relevance review found existing titles and descriptions that imply lifetime OnCall activity, measured absence or automatic safe deletion without the source contract. This bounded P1 wording-only follow-up preserves data and formulas and adds no vendor names, scopes or collector series. Quantitative OnCall cohort repair and unresolved host/billing normalization are excluded owner decisions.

Acceptance Criteria

Definition of Done

Implementation Plan

Bounded P1 semantic wording corrections after planned dashboard chain: inspect doc-0007 recommendations, preserve all formulas/query/data/selection contracts, assemble actual artifacts with honest gauge/seven-day and absence/configuration framing. Red-first meaningful artifact checks, final gate and independent review; no quantitative cohort repair.

Implementation Notes

Loop13: 1 implementation attempt,0 review-repair rounds. Wording candidatef8440651c3783d6db0731e99a4169a31972706ea accepted/landed; independent immutable baseline-first22failures then candidategreen,11artifacts86presentationchanges0nonpresentationdifferences. Original worker red-after-edit chronology defect remains disclosed, not retrospectively repaired by proof. Complete CR0findings all3ownedpaths. Composed clean immutable scratch just check2204passed2skipped13421subtests; exactSHA CI37482147217 required leaves success. Source units/cohorts/formulas unchanged; no live/browser/numerical repair claimed.

Final Summary

Qualified OnCall gauge/seven-day diagnostic ratios, sparse absence, configured objects, deletion and saved-time implications while preserving every non-text artifact contract.

View the source file on GitHub